First Sunday in Lent
February 29, 2004

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Passion/Palm Sunday—April 4, 2004

The Ultimate Test

Lectionary Readings for Liturgy of the Passion
Year “C”
Isaiah 50:4-9a
Psalm 31:9-16
Philippians 2:5-11
Luke 22:14—23:56 or Luke 23:1-49
Lectionary Readings for Liturgy of the Palms
Year “C”
Luke 19:28-40
Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29

Text: Luke 22:39-46

Listening to the Text

Jesus’ struggle on the Mount of Olives (Luke never calls it the Garden of Gethsemane, because Gethsemane was an Aramaic name and would sound strange to his Greek readers) has been aptly described as the watershed of Luke’s account of the Passion Story. It is not too much to say that everything in the account of Jesus’ suffering and death crests at this point; and everything following it is determined by it. This is made clear in two main ways.

First, it is made clear from the context of the gospel as a whole. Jesus is now in Jerusalem, the destination to which he has been steadily traveling, and we know what Jerusalem means for him. It is the place he has been warned away from, the stronghold of his opponents and enemies, the place of danger. But with dogged persistence he has made his way there. For another thing, the passage begins and ends with a reference to temptation, testing, trial. We have heard those words before, notably in the temptations in the wilderness, when the devil tempted him to divest his role as the obedient Son of God (4:1-13). The devil failed in his objective, but “departed from him until an opportune time” (13). That time has now come.

Second, the pivotal character of the prayer on the Mount of Olives is underscored by certain features of the immediate context. There is the heavy emphasis on prayer: a standing motif in Luke’s gospel (as well as Acts), but mentioned no fewer than five times in these verses. The passage begins and ends with a command to the disciples not to fail to pray (40, 46), while three specific references are made to Jesus’ praying (41, 44, 45). There is the description of Jesus’ destiny under the form of a ‘cup’ (42): a familiar Old Testament metaphor for divine judgment (Isaiah 51:22; Jeremiah 25:15; cf. Mark 10:38). And just as the devil is active in his own interests, so there is intervention from heaven in the form of a strengthening angel to sustain Jesus in his struggle (43). His struggle is real because he is a real human being. He knows the Father’s will and wishes it were different. But in the end obedience to the Father triumphs (42).

Clearly, then, in this passage we are standing on the edge of something great: something freighted with cosmic significance and eternal import. Nothing less than the salvation of the world hangs in the balances, and we wait with bated breath to see on which side the balances will fall.

Engaging the Text

The Need

Remarkably, the one who is primarily in need in this passage is Jesus. The focus falls on him. This becomes particularly clear when Luke’s account of this event is compared with Mark’s (Mark 14:32-42). There is no mention of Jesus’ taking Peter and James and John to support him in his agitation of soul (Mark 14:33). There is no rebuke of Peter or the other disciples for falling asleep (Mark 14:37, 41). Jesus is the only one who speaks of praying, and the only one who prays. The light shows him in his solitary struggle for the world’s redemption. Luke makes us privileged spectators at the battle of the ages. If the primary focus falls on Jesus there are also secondary implications and applications. As we see Jesus’ need of strength to face trial and temptation, we are reminded forcefully of our own. As we see him struggling with God’s will which he wishes were different, we see ourselves in the mirror. Even more, we see ourselves in the disciples who cannot stay awake to pray (46).

God’s Answer

The strengthening angel in verse 43 is God’s answer to Jesus’ agony. The mention of the strengthening angel is unique to Luke’s gospel. Its absence not only from the other gospels, but from many ancient manuscripts has led some to question its authenticity. But the language is Lucan. Moreover, it is unlikely that anyone would invent an episode which presented Jesus as weak, and being in need of special strength from heaven. Rather, it makes the point that God lends us his help when accepting his will is difficult. It is also to the point that it was through prayer that Jesus battled his way through to acceptance. “In his anguish he prayed more earnestly” (44), so much so that his sweat fell from him like drops of blood.

Our Response

As we contemplate Jesus’ struggle in prayer, his torment of soul as he wrestles with God’s will for him, and his final acceptance of it: “not my will but yours be done” (42), our response can only be amazement and wonder, awe and adoration. This was the critical moment. From this point on, the cross is inevitable: not because of fate, but because of Jesus’ free choice. His submission and surrender to God’s will was now complete, and with it, our salvation.

This carries the implication for us that acceptance of what Christ accepted but did not want is the pattern to be transposed into our lives. Twice in the passage Jesus exhorts the disciples to pray (40, 46): to pray not for him but for themselves that they “may not come into the time of trial.” Just as he wanted to be spared the cross, so he wanted them to be spared the confusion and failure that the crucifixion could involve for them. That prayer—if they ever prayed it—was no more answered than his prayer for himself. But just as he discovered that in prayer one could come to embrace what one did not like, so the record of the Acts of the Apostles goes to show that they embraced the message of the crucified Christ, and preached it regardless of the cost.

Preaching the Text

(For a sermon example from this text go to www.preachersmagazine.org and click on “Sermons”)
The tense solemnity of the prayer on the Mount of Olives gives the sermon its own gripping power. The preacher has no need to create artificial effects. He or she simply has to interpret the story faithfully for its pungency to be manifested. Luke’s version of it perhaps even more than Mark’s has a tensile strength deriving from the way in which Jesus’ solitary struggle is presented. The solitude of Jesus, the intensity of his prayer, the depth of his agony stand in singular contrast with the indolence of the disciples who seem confused, bewildered and disengaged.

The effect of all of this is to underline that Jesus alone is the author of salvation; he alone drank the cup of God’s judgment upon sin; he alone submitted to the will of the Father. Any sermon that would do justice to the text cannot fail to lay bare these truths.