|
|||
![]() |

Ambassadors, agents, emissaries, attorneys, and siblings all
have something in common. They are often given the responsibility to speak
on behalf of somebody else. Ambassadors speak for a nation. Agents speak for
a client. Emissaries speak for a leader, and siblings often speak to their
brothers or sisters for their parents. Those of you who are parents with more
than one child know what I mean. Its the Go tell your sister,
I said
routine. Whether nations, business contracts, legal negotiations,
or simple family communication, the principle is the same. Though the voice
and the words belong to the messenger, the message and the authority backing
up that message belong to the one they represent.
Let me illustrate. I have two children. When they were much
younger I loved listening in to their conversations when they were attempting
to work together at their weekly chores or resolve a difference of opinion.
I can remember a few occasions in which my wife (the real authority at our
house) would tell our oldest daughter to convey a command to her sister that
was to be immediately obeyed. My younger daughter has a streak of independence
and stubbornness and it was not beyond her to ignore the request, thinking
it was only from her sister, and go about her own business. The intensity
of the conversation would increase exponentially to the place where the older
would threaten mortal wounds if the younger refused to comply. The younger
stood her ground with her rebellious cry, You cant make me!
The banter began. Oh yes, I can! No you cant!
Yes, I can! No, you cant! Oh yes, I can!
After enough time had passed so that they both felt like theyd defended
their honor as free moral agents, the younger challenged the source of authority,
Oh yeah, who says? This was the moment the older child had been
waiting for. Mom says, thats who! The case was closed. The verdict
was in. The score: older sister--one; younger sister--zero! The older spoke
for the ultimate authority, Mom. Perhaps youve experienced similar moments
at your house.
Our text places Jesus and his disciples in a conversation about
things that had eternal consequences. Peter, in the power of the Spirit, had
confessed that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Jesus had
proclaimed that Peter and those who make the same confession are the living
stones upon which the church is established and continues to grow. He and
all who would follow in his footsteps would spend their lives involved in
doing things that would matter for eternity. They were done with the mundane
and ordinary. Such things were for those who had nothing better to do. No,
the disciples world was now one where earth and heaven came together
in Gods redemptive plan in Christ so the loosing and binding
had eternal consequences. They were into life and death issues
now. Their lives, like all those who confess that Jesus is the Christ, would
never be ordinary again. It was serious business. They just didnt know
how serious. But Jesus did.
Jesus had set his sights on Jerusalem, knowing a crown of thorns,
a rugged cross, and a borrowed tomb awaited him there. He didnt want
his disciples to be surprised by those stark and powerful images of suffering,
death, and resurrection. He didnt want them to have any false assumptions
about the nature of his calling and kingdom. Matthew states, From that
time on Jesus began to explain to his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem
and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, chief priests and teachers
of the law, and that he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life.
(v. 21)
Jesus didnt want the disciples to have any false assumptions
about their calling either, since it was essentially the same as his own.
He explained, If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and
take up his cross and follow me (v. 16). This was no low-key, soft sell
pitch selling an easy journey and half-hearted commitment. This was no bait-and-switch
game in which Jesus promised them an easy road and then changed the contract
after they had signed their names on the dotted line. If the disciples were
going to participate in Jesus life, they would also have to participate
in his suffering and death. There was no alternative for them. And there is
no alternative for us. Jesus made it clear. That is the way it will be.
Those of us who know Peter and his propensity to speak are not
surprised that he had something to say in the midst of an important speech
like that. Listen to Matthews description in verse 22. Peter took
him aside and began to rebuke him. Never, Lord! he said. This
shall never happen to you! Can you hear his passion? Youre
the Messiah. You shouldnt die. That cannot be the plan. Youre
the Messiah. You cant die. Who, then, would save us? Youre the
Messiah. You wont die. After all, youre the Son of the Living
God!
We shouldnt be too harsh on Peter. I cant fault
his motive. I believe he was speaking out of love for the one who he had proclaimed
to be the Christ, the Savior of the world. I believe Peter spoke sincerely
and selflessly with Jesus best interest in mind. I believe he was committed
to Jesus success. I believe that Peter believed that his words were
not really his own. He was compelled to speak by a power greater than himself.
If Jesus would have challenged Peters source of authority by saying,
Oh yeah, who says? Peter would have confidently replied, God
does, thats who! The case is closed. The verdict is in. Score:
Peter--one; Jesus--zero, even if Jesus was the Son of God!
That was exactly the problem. Peter believed he was speaking for God when,
in fact, nothing was further from the truth. The voice and the words were
Peters, but the message and the power behind the message were directly
from the Tempters tongue. And Jesus knew it. Get behind me, Satan!
(v.23)
Jesus had heard that voice before. It was the voice of Satan
who had confronted him in the wilderness following his baptism. Read it for
yourself in Matthew 4:1-11. Jesus, since you are the Son of God, turn
these stones to bread, you shouldnt die! Jesus, since you are the Son
of God, jump off the temple tower and save yourself, you cant die! Jesus,
bow down and worship me just once and I will give you all the kingdoms of
this world. You wont die! It was Peters voice in Jesus
ears, but these were definitely Satans wilderness words echoing in Jesus
heart.
The banished Satan had returned in the form of a beloved friend.
The wilderness temptation to abandon the will and plan of God for an easier
road had returned through the well-meaning, yet naïve disciple. The rock
to be placed as one of the first of the living stones of the church had become
a stumbling block in the middle of path of obedience to the perfect will of
God. Peter, who had spoken for God when he voiced the truth of heaven and
earth, You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God, now spoke
for Satan as he cried, Never, Lord! This shall not happen to you!
And Peter didnt even know it!
So once again, as he had done those many months before, Jesus
banished Satan from his sight. Be quiet! Be gone! Only suffering and
death can lead to life. I am resolved to do Gods will. It would not
be the last time he would hear his voice.
And then to well-meaning, loving, sincere, naïve, blind
Peter, Jesus turns. Peter, if you would be my disciple, you must find
your place not in front of me, but behind me. You must follow me, Peter. Follow
me in doing Gods will. Deny yourself, Peter. Take up your cross, Peter.
Follow me, Peter. Then you will know what it means to speak for God.
I cannot help but wonder if I, at times, am as blind and naïve
as Peter. When I think I am speaking for God, could I actually be Satans
voice? In my love for Christ, could I still be singing the tempters
tune? In my own limited wisdom, when I think I know what God would say, could
I end up speaking for Satan instead? I wonder. And, frankly, I wonder the
same thing about you.
Do we love Jesus? Im sure we do. Do we have his interests
at heart? Im sure we do. Do we want the cause of Christ to be a success?
Im sure we do. Do we always speak for God? Im not so sure.
When we who are Christians choose words of convenience over
sacrifice, for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words of revenge over forgiveness,
for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words of greed over generosity,
for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words of privileged power
over service, for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words of self- interest over
the interest of others, for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words of personal security
over trusting faith, for whom do we speak?
When we who are Christians choose words about saving our lives
rather than losing them in Christ, for whom do we speak?
I am reminded of Jesus straightforward call, If
anyone would come after, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow
me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his
life for me will find it. What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole
world, yet forfeits his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?
(v.v.24-26).
Consider in earnest for whom you speak. By your words, by your values, by your actions, for whom do you speak? We, like Peter, are beloved disciples. We, like Peter, are the living stones on whom the church is being built. We, like Peter, have confessed our faith in Jesus the Christ, the Son of the Living God. We, like Peter, have been called to speak for God. Peter thought he was. Are you sure you are?